References
Ahsan Ullah, A. K. M. 2022. “Ethics and Empirics:
Essence of Ethics in Social
Research.” In Principles of Social
Research Methodology, edited by M. Rezaul
Islam, Niaz Ahmed Khan, and Rajendra Baikady, 471–82. Singapore:
Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_34.
Alavi, Marie, and Tobias Schmohl. 2023. “Research
Integrity.” In Handbook
Transdisciplinary Learning, edited by
Thorsten Philipp and Tobias Schmohl, 1st ed., 6:297–306. Bielefeld,
Germany: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463475-031.
Austin, Ann E. 2002. “Preparing the Next
Generation of Faculty: Graduate
School as Socialization to the
Academic Career.” The Journal of
Higher Education 73 (1): 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777132.
Belcher, Brian M., Katherine E. Rasmussen, Matthew R. Kemshaw, and
Deborah A. Zornes. 2016. “Defining and Assessing Research Quality
in a Transdisciplinary Context.” Research Evaluation 25
(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv025.
Berger, Wilhelm. 2010. “Methoden Der
Interdisziplinarität.” In Interdisziplinarität.
Wissenschaft Im Wandel. Beiträge
Zur Entwicklung Der Fakultät Für
Umwelt-, Regional- Und
Bildungswissenschaft., edited by Werner Lenz, 51–67.
Wien: Löcker.
Bhattacherjee, Anol, Mark Toleman, Samara Rowling, Anita Frederiks, and
Nikki Andersen. 2019. “Social Science
Research: Principles, Methods and
Practices.” Edited by Samara Rowling. https://doi.org/10.26192/Q7W89.
Boden, Daniel, Maura Borrego, and Lynita K. Newswander. 2011.
“Student Socialization in Interdisciplinary Doctoral
Education.” Higher Education 62 (6): 741–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9415-1.
Choy, Looi Theam. 2014. “The Strengths and
Weaknesses of Research
Methodology: Comparison and
Complimentary Between Qualitative and
Quantitative Approaches.” IOSR
Journal of Humanities and Social Science 19 (4): 99–104. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-194399104.
Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research Design:
Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods Approaches.
4th ed. London: Sage Publications.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, and Simon Schwartzman.
2010. The New Production of
Knowledge: The Dynamics of
Science and Research in
Contemporary Societies. London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853.
Haq, Muhibul. 2014. “A Comparative
Analysis of Qualitative and
Quantitative Research Methods and
a Justification for Adopting
Mixed Methods in Social
Research.” Annual PhD Conference, University of
Bradford Business School of Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1945.8640.
Hirsch Hadorn, G., and G. Brun. 2007. “Ethische
Probleme Nachhaltiger Entwicklung.”
SAGW: Nachhaltigkeitsforschung – Perspektiven Der Sozial- Und
Geisteswissenschaften, 235–54.
Hopf, Henning, Alain Krief, Goverdhan Mehta, and Stephen A. Matlin.
2019. “Fake Science and the Knowledge Crisis: Ignorance Can Be
Fatal.” Royal Society Open Science 6 (5): 190161. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190161.
Jonas, Hans. 1987. Das Prinzip
Verantwortung. Versuch Einer
Ethik Für Die Technologische
Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kagan, Jerome. 2009. The Three Cultures:
Natural Sciences, Social
Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st
Century. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576638.
Kates, Robert W., William C. Clark, Robert Corell, J. Michael Hall,
Carlo C. Jaeger, Ian Lowe, James J. McCarthy, et al. 2001.
“Sustainability Science.” Science 292
(5517): 641–42. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.
Lüscher, Thomas F. 2019. “Honesty and Truth in
Academic Research and
Writing.” In A Guide to the
Scientific Career, 139–54. John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch17.
Martens, Pim. 2006. “Sustainability: Science or Fiction?”
Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 2 (1): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2006.11907976.
Philipp, Thorsten, and Tobias Schmohl, eds. 2023. Handbook
Transdisciplinary Learning. 1st ed. Vol.
6. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463475.
Pilcher, Nick, and Martin Cortazzi. 2024.
“’Qualitative’ and ’Quantitative’ Methods and
Approaches Across Subject Fields: Implications for Research Values,
Assumptions, and Practices.” Quality & Quantity 58
(3): 2357–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4.
ProClim. 1997. “Research on Sustainability and
Global Change – Visions in
Science Policy by Swiss
Researchers.” Bern: ProClim-Forum for Climate;
Global Change. proclim.ch/id/Yzz6d.
Queirós, André, Daniel Faria, and Fernando Almeida. 2017.
“Strengths and Limitations of
Qualitative and Quantitative
Research Methods.” European Journal
of Education Studies 3 (9). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089.
Renn, Ortwin, Jürgen Deuschle, Alexander Jäger, and Wolfgang
Weimer-Jehle. 2007. Leitbild Nachhaltigkeit.
Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90495-5.
Schirmer, Dominique. 2009. Empirische Methoden Der
Sozialforschung: Grundlagen Und
Techniken. 1st ed. Stuttgart, Deutschland: utb GmbH.
https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838531755.
Schneidewind, Uwe. 2013. “Transformative Literacy.
Gesellschaftliche Veränderungsprozesse
Verstehen Und Gestalten.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for
Science and Society 22 (2): 82–86. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.22.2.5.
Stock, Paul, and Rob J. F. Burton. 2011. “Defining
Terms for Integrated
(Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary)
Sustainability Research.”
Sustainability 3 (8): 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3081090.
Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. 2021. “Code of Conduct for
Scientific Integrity.” Swiss Academies of Arts; Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4707560.
Walter, Hildrun, and Kerstin Kremer. 2023. “Scientific
Knowledge.” In Handbook
Transdisciplinary Learning, edited by
Thorsten Philipp and Tobias Schmohl, 1st ed., 6:339–48. Bielefeld,
Germany: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463475-035.
Zabed, Hossain M., and Xianghui Qi. 2022. “Plagiarism and
Referencing Techniques Used in
Social Research Report.”
In Principles of Social Research
Methodology, edited by M. Rezaul Islam, Niaz Ahmed
Khan, and Rajendra Baikady, 485–505. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_35.