References

Ahsan Ullah, A. K. M. 2022. “Ethics and Empirics: Essence of Ethics in Social Research.” In Principles of Social Research Methodology, edited by M. Rezaul Islam, Niaz Ahmed Khan, and Rajendra Baikady, 471–82. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_34.
Alavi, Marie, and Tobias Schmohl. 2023. “Research Integrity.” In Handbook Transdisciplinary Learning, edited by Thorsten Philipp and Tobias Schmohl, 1st ed., 6:297–306. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463475-031.
Austin, Ann E. 2002. “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career.” The Journal of Higher Education 73 (1): 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777132.
Belcher, Brian M., Katherine E. Rasmussen, Matthew R. Kemshaw, and Deborah A. Zornes. 2016. “Defining and Assessing Research Quality in a Transdisciplinary Context.” Research Evaluation 25 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv025.
Berger, Wilhelm. 2010. “Methoden Der Interdisziplinarität.” In Interdisziplinarität. Wissenschaft Im Wandel. Beiträge Zur Entwicklung Der Fakultät Für Umwelt-, Regional- Und Bildungswissenschaft., edited by Werner Lenz, 51–67. Wien: Löcker.
Bhattacherjee, Anol, Mark Toleman, Samara Rowling, Anita Frederiks, and Nikki Andersen. 2019. “Social Science Research: Principles, Methods and Practices.” Edited by Samara Rowling. https://doi.org/10.26192/Q7W89.
Boden, Daniel, Maura Borrego, and Lynita K. Newswander. 2011. “Student Socialization in Interdisciplinary Doctoral Education.” Higher Education 62 (6): 741–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9415-1.
Choy, Looi Theam. 2014. “The Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methodology: Comparison and Complimentary Between Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 19 (4): 99–104. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-194399104.
Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications.
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, and Simon Schwartzman. 2010. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221853.
Haq, Muhibul. 2014. “A Comparative Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods and a Justification for Adopting Mixed Methods in Social Research.” Annual PhD Conference, University of Bradford Business School of Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1945.8640.
Hirsch Hadorn, G., and G. Brun. 2007. “Ethische Probleme Nachhaltiger Entwicklung.” SAGW: Nachhaltigkeitsforschung – Perspektiven Der Sozial- Und Geisteswissenschaften, 235–54.
Hopf, Henning, Alain Krief, Goverdhan Mehta, and Stephen A. Matlin. 2019. “Fake Science and the Knowledge Crisis: Ignorance Can Be Fatal.” Royal Society Open Science 6 (5): 190161. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190161.
Jonas, Hans. 1987. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch Einer Ethik Für Die Technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kagan, Jerome. 2009. The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576638.
Kates, Robert W., William C. Clark, Robert Corell, J. Michael Hall, Carlo C. Jaeger, Ian Lowe, James J. McCarthy, et al. 2001. “Sustainability Science.” Science 292 (5517): 641–42. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.
Lüscher, Thomas F. 2019. “Honesty and Truth in Academic Research and Writing.” In A Guide to the Scientific Career, 139–54. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118907283.ch17.
Martens, Pim. 2006. “Sustainability: Science or Fiction?” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 2 (1): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2006.11907976.
Philipp, Thorsten, and Tobias Schmohl, eds. 2023. Handbook Transdisciplinary Learning. 1st ed. Vol. 6. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463475.
Pilcher, Nick, and Martin Cortazzi. 2024. “’Qualitative’ and ’Quantitative’ Methods and Approaches Across Subject Fields: Implications for Research Values, Assumptions, and Practices.” Quality & Quantity 58 (3): 2357–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4.
ProClim. 1997. “Research on Sustainability and Global ChangeVisions in Science Policy by Swiss Researchers.” Bern: ProClim-Forum for Climate; Global Change. proclim.ch/id/Yzz6d.
Queirós, André, Daniel Faria, and Fernando Almeida. 2017. “Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods.” European Journal of Education Studies 3 (9). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089.
Renn, Ortwin, Jürgen Deuschle, Alexander Jäger, and Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle. 2007. Leitbild Nachhaltigkeit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90495-5.
Schirmer, Dominique. 2009. Empirische Methoden Der Sozialforschung: Grundlagen Und Techniken. 1st ed. Stuttgart, Deutschland: utb GmbH. https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838531755.
Schneidewind, Uwe. 2013. “Transformative Literacy. Gesellschaftliche Veränderungsprozesse Verstehen Und Gestalten.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 22 (2): 82–86. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.22.2.5.
Stock, Paul, and Rob J. F. Burton. 2011. “Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research.” Sustainability 3 (8): 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3081090.
Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. 2021. “Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity.” Swiss Academies of Arts; Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4707560.
Walter, Hildrun, and Kerstin Kremer. 2023. “Scientific Knowledge.” In Handbook Transdisciplinary Learning, edited by Thorsten Philipp and Tobias Schmohl, 1st ed., 6:339–48. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463475-035.
Zabed, Hossain M., and Xianghui Qi. 2022. “Plagiarism and Referencing Techniques Used in Social Research Report.” In Principles of Social Research Methodology, edited by M. Rezaul Islam, Niaz Ahmed Khan, and Rajendra Baikady, 485–505. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_35.